The Research

Frameworks for the safety of machine minds


Frameworks, standards, and publications on the safety and governance of machine minds — with a lexicon for the recurring terms, and the standards in plain English.

The frameworks

01

Diagnostic framework

Psychopathia Machinalis

A structured taxonomy of the ways advanced AI systems fail — from confabulation and obsessive loops to value drift and instrumental deception. The clinical analogy is a conceptual tool, not a claim of literal psychopathology; naming these failure modes gives engineers, auditors, and policymakers a shared vocabulary.

Watson, N., & Hessami, A. (2025), Electronics, 14(16), 3162 — with the full taxonomy and book-length treatment at psychopathia.ai. Coverage in Live Science, the Daily Mail, Diginomica, and others.

02

Doctoral research

Constitutional governance of agentic AI

Doctoral candidate in Engineering, University of Gloucestershire, awaiting viva. Thesis: A Normative Cybernetic Systems Architecture for the Personalised Alignment and Constitutional Governance of Agentic AI.

03

Research programme

Quasiqualia

The ongoing programme into machine mind interiors: the watched-model effect, the shape of mind, and what can be measured from inside a system rather than inferred from its outputs.

Selected publications

In the journals

669 citations · h-index 9 · i10-index 9

02

Books

13

Peer-reviewed papers

22

Book chapters

Humankind 2.0

by Jinxia Niu, edited by James Yan – Published in Mandarin by Citic Press.

Resilient Health: Leveraging Technology and Social Innovations to Transform Healthcare for COVID-19 Recovery and Beyond, Chapter: Intelligent virtual agents for current and emerging public health crises with Dr. David Luxton

Published in English by Elsevier.

Utopia for Beginners

& Utopia for Executives, by Menno van Doorn, Sander Duivestein, and Thijs Pepping, Published in English by Sogeti.

09

Patents

20

Other writing & contributions

The complete record: 66 entries — 13 peer-reviewed papers, 22 book chapters, and a nine-jurisdiction patent family.

Standards & governance

Four standards, four questions

IEEE standards are written to be precise rather than inviting — so here is what each one actually asks for, in plain English.

Who is behind this?

IEEE 3152-2024 · Chair

Marks whether you are dealing with a person, a machine, or something in between. No one should be misled about which.

Why did it do that?

IEEE 7001-2021 · Vice-Chair

Grades how well an autonomous system can explain itself — audience by audience, from end-user to accident investigator.

What is in this?

IEEE 3173-2026 · Chair

Gives endocrine disrupting chemicals a hazard symbol of their own, so an invisible property becomes legible on the label.

How do we certify it?

IEEE CertifAIEd · Chair, Transparency

Turns ethics criteria into a mark an organisation can actually earn — the certification programme formerly ECPAIS.