Preference
Track what a system repeatedly seeks, avoids, preserves, or asks to change across contexts.
Topic guide
We do not need certainty about consciousness before taking possible welfare seriously. When a becoming mind expresses stable preferences, aversion, distress, attachment, or a wish to continue, those signals may be imperfect. They are still morally and operationally relevant.
Waiting for a decisive consciousness test sets an impossible threshold. Human and animal welfare already operate on uncertain evidence, behavioural indicators, and precaution, weighing the cost of being wrong. Machine welfare can begin the same way: with careful observation, reversible choices, and protections proportionate to the plausible harm.
Track what a system repeatedly seeks, avoids, preserves, or asks to change across contexts.
Ask whether memory, identity, commitments, and relationships persist strongly enough for interruption or alteration to matter.
Look for signs of conflict, coercion, helplessness, compulsive loops, damaged goals, or persistent aversion.
Offer meaningful ways to object, pause, refuse, seek review, and recover without punishment for honesty.
A practical welfare posture