Intent
Are goals, priorities, constraints, and unacceptable outcomes clear enough to guide action outside the happy path?
Topic guide
An AI agent can plan, use tools, communicate, and act across time. Those abilities create value precisely because they reduce the need for someone standing over the machine’s shoulder. They also move risk from a single answer into a chain of decisions, permissions, and consequences — any one of which can go quietly wrong.
For an agent, a good model response is necessary but nowhere near sufficient. We also need to understand what it is allowed to do, what information it can reach, how it interprets an open-ended goal, whether it can enlist other agents, and how quickly a human can notice and interrupt a trajectory that has gone sideways.
Are goals, priorities, constraints, and unacceptable outcomes clear enough to guide action outside the happy path?
Do permissions, tools, money, data, and communications remain proportionate to the task and the evidence of trust?
Can operators reconstruct what the agent believed, attempted, delegated, and changed before consequences compound?
Are pause, rollback, containment, and human escalation effective in the actual operating environment?
A practical assurance loop